Crypto Crackdown Down Under: ASIC’s Pyrrhic Victory against Kraken
At the end of August, the court agreed with the Australian Securities and Investment Commission (ASIC), confirming that the cryptocurrency exchange Kraken violated local regulations by offering margin products to retail clients. However, the company operating under the brand Bit Trade Pty Ltd claims that the issue is more complex.Kraken Margin Trading Ruling Exposes Australia's Crypto Regulation GapThe ruling, which centered on Kraken's Margin Extension product, determined that margin trading extended in fiat currency to retail investors falls under the Design and Distribution Obligations (DDO) of the Corporations Act. However, the court found that the margin extended in cryptocurrency is not subject to the same regulations.While ASIC hailed the decision as a victory, Kraken argues it exposes significant gaps in the country's approach to crypto regulation.“This ruling makes it clearer than ever that bespoke crypto regulation is urgently needed,” Kraken commented in the new blog post. “Australian crypto investors and businesses continue to operate in a confusing and uncertain regulatory environment.”Understanding ASIC's Recent Judgment: The Need for a Clear Crypto Regulatory Framework in AustraliaRead more: https://t.co/9NhoiC82ii#ASIC #CryptoRegulation #Kraken #MarginTrading #Australia pic.twitter.com/h826lWyLTv— sinyalbak (@sinyalbak) September 9, 2024The judgment comes as Australia lags behind other jurisdictions in implementing comprehensive crypto regulations. Despite ongoing consultations and efforts by the Treasury, legislation could be delayed beyond the end of the year, potentially hampering the industry's growth and innovation.In the past, the exchange has experienced regulatory issues in other regions of the world, including in the US. Almost a year ago, it was sued by The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for illegally operating an unregistered securities exchange, broker, dealer, and clearing agency.Kraken Changes Margin ProductsIn response to the newest Australian court ruling, Kraken has implemented immediate changes to its Margin Extension product. Margin trading with fiat is now restricted for Australian residents unless they qualify as Wholesale Investors under the Corporations Act. These restrictions do not apply to margin extensions when trading with crypto assets (including pairs like BTC/ETH or BTC/USDT).“We comply with legal and regulatory requirements in all jurisdictions in which we operate,” Kraken added. “Kraken is committed to expanding its compliant product offering and is working on additional eligibility pathways for fiat margin extensions in the coming months.”The case highlights the global race to provide tailored regulation for crypto assets, with countries like the United States, United Kingdom, and Singapore making strides in this area. Clear and proportionate frameworks are seen as crucial for allowing individuals to safely harness the potential of blockchain technology while ensuring appropriate regulatory protections. This article was written by Damian Chmiel at www.financemagnates.com.
FieNews 
At the end of August, the court agreed with the Australian Securities and Investment Commission (ASIC), confirming that the cryptocurrency exchange Kraken violated local regulations by offering margin products to retail clients. However, the company operating under the brand Bit Trade Pty Ltd claims that the issue is more complex.
Kraken Margin Trading Ruling Exposes Australia's Crypto Regulation Gap
The ruling, which centered on Kraken's Margin Extension product, determined that margin trading extended in fiat currency to retail investors falls under the Design and Distribution Obligations (DDO) of the Corporations Act. However, the court found that the margin extended in cryptocurrency is not subject to the same regulations.
While ASIC hailed the decision as a victory, Kraken argues it exposes significant gaps in the country's approach to crypto regulation.
“This ruling makes it clearer than ever that bespoke crypto regulation is urgently needed,” Kraken commented in the new blog post. “Australian crypto investors and businesses continue to operate in a confusing and uncertain regulatory environment.”
Understanding ASIC's Recent Judgment: The Need for a Clear Crypto Regulatory Framework in AustraliaRead more: https://t.co/9NhoiC82ii#ASIC #CryptoRegulation #Kraken #MarginTrading #Australia pic.twitter.com/h826lWyLTv— sinyalbak (@sinyalbak) September 9, 2024
The judgment comes as Australia lags behind other jurisdictions in implementing comprehensive crypto regulations. Despite ongoing consultations and efforts by the Treasury, legislation could be delayed beyond the end of the year, potentially hampering the industry's growth and innovation.
In the past, the exchange has experienced regulatory issues in other regions of the world, including in the US. Almost a year ago, it was sued by The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for illegally operating an unregistered securities exchange, broker, dealer, and clearing agency.
Kraken Changes Margin Products
In response to the newest Australian court ruling, Kraken has implemented immediate changes to its Margin Extension product. Margin trading with fiat is now restricted for Australian residents unless they qualify as Wholesale Investors under the Corporations Act. These restrictions do not apply to margin extensions when trading with crypto assets (including pairs like BTC/ETH or BTC/USDT).
“We comply with legal and regulatory requirements in all jurisdictions in which we operate,” Kraken added. “Kraken is committed to expanding its compliant product offering and is working on additional eligibility pathways for fiat margin extensions in the coming months.”
The case highlights the global race to provide tailored regulation for crypto assets, with countries like the United States, United Kingdom, and Singapore making strides in this area. Clear and proportionate frameworks are seen as crucial for allowing individuals to safely harness the potential of blockchain technology while ensuring appropriate regulatory protections. This article was written by Damian Chmiel at www.financemagnates.com.
